solicitors for you.
- Residential Conveyancing
- House Sales & Purchases
- Mortgage & Re-mortgage
- Part Exchange
- Transfer of Ownership
- Transfer of Equity
- Boundary Disputes
- Landlord & Tenant Disputes
- Declaration of Trust Deed
- Lease Extensions
- Flats & Apartments
- New Build Properties
- Right to Buy Schemes
- Buy to Let Sales & Purchases
solicitors for business.
Case law: Contractual party could not take advantage of non-performance by another party if it caused the non-performance
Friday 17th July 2015
If a party to a contract cannot perform a contractual obligation because of the other party's action (or inaction), the first party may be entitled to ignore that obligation, a recent ruling has confirmed.
Under a contract, the parties had to refer certain disputes to an 'Engineer' retained by one of them (Party A) before the dispute could be referred to an arbitrator. The Engineer then had 84 days to issue a decision. One of the parties (Party B) referred a dispute to the Engineer. However, Party A had ended the Engineer's retainer. It was therefore clear that the Engineer could not make a decision on the dispute. Party B therefore tried to start arbitration proceedings. Party A argued it could not do so until the 84-day period had expired.
The Court ruled that the dispute could go straight to arbitration. Party A could not insist on Party B waiting 84 days for nothing, because it was Party A who had ended the Engineer's retainer.
The Court relied first on a long-standing legal principle that if a party entered into an arrangement which could only take effect by the continuance of a certain existing set of circumstances, "there is an implied engagement on his part that he shall do nothing of his own motion to put an end to that state of circumstances, under which alone the arrangement can be operative".
It also relied on a more recent legal ruling saying that the question in such circumstances was "what the [contract], read as a whole against the relevant background, would reasonably be understood to mean".
Once it was absolutely clear that the Engineer was not going to make a decision, then the parties' choices were either to find another engineer or elect that the contract no longer bound them in this respect. Since Party A had not tried to find another Engineer, the requirement to go to the Engineer for a decision no longer applied.
- If a party to a contract cannot perform an obligation under it because of the other party's action (or inaction) then the first party may be entitled to ignore that obligation.
Case ref: AL Waddan Hotel Ltd v Man Enterprise Sal (Offshore)  EWHC 4796
Atom Content Marketing 2015
See more news from 2015.
- Walk the Lights for Rosemere - Posted by A-1 on 2017-10-19
- Supporting Rosemere with staff Christmas Jumper Day - Posted by A-1 on 2017-12-15
- Get To Know Our New Starters - Posted by A-1 on 2017-08-29
- World Head and Neck Cancer Conference - Posted by A-1 on 2017-11-08
- 10% off LPA when you do a Will at the same time - Posted by A-1 on 2017-10-13
- Excellent personal service from Helen who explained everything and was so very helpful.
Stay in Touch
Stay in touch and up to date with our new focus newsletter
Events and Seminars